Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][Patch 3/5] Per-task delay accounting: Sync block I/O delays

On Wed, 2005-12-07 at 22:23 +0000, Shailabh Nagar wrote:
> 
> +       if (-EIOCBQUEUED == ret) {
> +               __attribute__((unused)) struct timespec start, end;
> +

Those "unused" things suck.  They're really ugly.

Doesn't making your delay functions into static inlines make the unused
warnings go away?

-- Dave

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][Patch 3/5] Per-task delay accounting: Sync block I/O delays
    • From: Shailabh Nagar <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [RFC][Patch 0/5] Per-task delay accounting
    • From: Shailabh Nagar <[email protected]>
  • [RFC][Patch 3/5] Per-task delay accounting: Sync block I/O delays
    • From: Shailabh Nagar <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: pcibus_to_node value when no pxm info is present for the pci bus
• Next by Date: Re: [RFC]add ACPI hooks for IDE suspend/resume
• Previous by thread: [RFC][Patch 3/5] Per-task delay accounting: Sync block I/O delays
• Next by thread: Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][Patch 3/5] Per-task delay accounting: Sync block I/O delays
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]