Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][Patch 3/5] Per-task delay accounting: Sync block I/O delays

Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-12-07 at 22:23 +0000, Shailabh Nagar wrote:
> 
>>+       if (-EIOCBQUEUED == ret) {
>>+               __attribute__((unused)) struct timespec start, end;
>>+
> 
> 
> Those "unused" things suck.  They're really ugly.
> 
> Doesn't making your delay functions into static inlines make the unused
> warnings go away?

They do indeed. Thanks !
It was a holdover from when the delay funcs were macros. Will fix everywhere.

--Shailabh


> 
> -- Dave
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [RFC][Patch 0/5] Per-task delay accounting
    • From: Shailabh Nagar <[email protected]>
  • [RFC][Patch 3/5] Per-task delay accounting: Sync block I/O delays
    • From: Shailabh Nagar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][Patch 3/5] Per-task delay accounting: Sync block I/O delays
    • From: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.15-rc4 panic in __nr_to_section() with CONFIG_SPARSEMEM
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Minor change to platform_device_register_simple prototype
• Previous by thread: Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][Patch 3/5] Per-task delay accounting: Sync block I/O delays
• Next by thread: [RFC][Patch 4/5] Per-task delay accounting: Swap in delays
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]