Re: Runs with Linux (tm)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Benjamin LaHaise wrote:

On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 02:12:20PM -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
If even some "Linux-friendly" hardware manufacturers barely cooperate
with the Linux comminuty now what makes you think this would work?

Nothing in life is guaranteed. But at the very least, I think it would be a good step towards improving the Linux end user experience. Instead of the unclear mess we have now (Is it supported? Check with your vendor!), we would be able to say "Look for the Linux Certified logo". Combine that with a standard format for source code driver disks, and it would be a good step in the right direction.

The problem as I see it:

A hardware vendor hires someone to write a driver. The driver is completed and submitted and finally makes it into the kernel. It's fully GPL and everyone is happy. The hardware gets a "Native Linux Support" logo. The card goes out of favor and no one is interested in maintaining the driver, it is marked obsolete and finally removed from the kernel. ...the logo still suggests the hardware will work.

Possible fix:

It might be possible to add a serial number to the logo, and keep a database that maintains a current status of the device in the Linux kernel.

Does this make sense?

--
Jeffrey Hundstad
PS. warning "not politically correct": When I heard "Native Linux Support" I immediately thought of Tux with a full Native American Indian headdress
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux