Jeffrey Hundstad writes: > It might be possible to add a serial number to the logo, and keep a > database that maintains a current status of the device in the Linux > kernel. > > Does this make sense? Not especially. To be accurate, it would have to be bumped every time a driver is removed from the kernel -- or, more accurately, every time the in-kernel API changes. To be useful, such an increment would have to only happen once a year or so, or else updating the packaging is too much work. Currently, the in-kernel API changes every month or two, which means a driver compatibility serial number would be inaccurate, futile, or both. Michael Poole - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Runs with Linux (tm)
- From: Helge Hafting <helge.hafting@aitel.hist.no>
- Re: Runs with Linux (tm)
- References:
- Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario
- From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
- Re: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario
- From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
- Re: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario
- From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
- Re: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario
- From: Brian Gerst <bgerst@didntduck.org>
- Re: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario
- From: Dirk Steuwer <dirk@steuwer.de>
- Re: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario
- From: Sander <sander@humilis.net>
- Re: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario
- From: Dirk Steuwer <dirk@steuwer.de>
- Runs with Linux (tm)
- From: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>
- Re: Runs with Linux (tm)
- From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
- Re: Runs with Linux (tm)
- From: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>
- Re: Runs with Linux (tm)
- From: Jeffrey Hundstad <jeffrey.hundstad@mnsu.edu>
- Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario
- Prev by Date: [RFC][Patch 4/5] Per-task delay accounting: Swap in delays
- Next by Date: [RFC][Patch 5/5] Per-task delay accounting: procfs interface
- Previous by thread: Re: Runs with Linux (tm)
- Next by thread: Re: Runs with Linux (tm)
- Index(es):
![]() |