On 12/8/05, Jeffrey Hundstad <[email protected]> wrote:
> Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 02:12:20PM -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> >
> >
> >>If even some "Linux-friendly" hardware manufacturers barely cooperate
> >>with the Linux comminuty now what makes you think this would work?
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Nothing in life is guaranteed. But at the very least, I think it would
> >be a good step towards improving the Linux end user experience. Instead
> >of the unclear mess we have now (Is it supported? Check with your
> >vendor!), we would be able to say "Look for the Linux Certified logo".
> >Combine that with a standard format for source code driver disks, and
> >it would be a good step in the right direction.
> >
> >
> >
> The problem as I see it:
>
> A hardware vendor hires someone to write a driver. The driver is
> completed and submitted and finally makes it into the kernel. It's
> fully GPL and everyone is happy. The hardware gets a "Native Linux
> Support" logo. The card goes out of favor and no one is interested in
> maintaining the driver, it is marked obsolete and finally removed from
> the kernel. ...the logo still suggests the hardware will work.
I think "Designed for Windows" has the same problem. I know some
hardware that works well with Win98 but no driver exist for XP.
Fortunately that hardware works with Linux...
I would say the fix is "Runs with Linux(tm) 2005-2006" and the
hardware vendor finances maintainance during the specified period.
/ magnus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
