Re: [-mm patch] init/main.c: dummy mark_rodata_ro() should be static

On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 11:54:40PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
 > On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 02:46:51PM -0800, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
 > > On Wed, 23 Nov 2005, Adrian Bunk wrote:
 > > 
 > > > Every inline dummy function should be static.
 > > 
 > > Please explain why it matters in this case.
 > 
 > We don't need an additional global copy of the function.

it's an empty body, surely the compiler will compile it away ?

		Dave

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [-mm patch] init/main.c: dummy mark_rodata_ro() should be static
  - From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: [-mm patch] init/main.c: dummy mark_rodata_ro() should be static
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

References:
- 2.6.15-rc2-mm1
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- [-mm patch] init/main.c: dummy mark_rodata_ro() should be static
  - From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: [-mm patch] init/main.c: dummy mark_rodata_ro() should be static
  - From: "Randy.Dunlap" <[email protected]>
- Re: [-mm patch] init/main.c: dummy mark_rodata_ro() should be static
  - From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: What protection does sysfs_readdir have with SMP/Preemption?
Next by Date: is_aligned_hugepage_range() cleanup
Previous by thread: Re: [-mm patch] init/main.c: dummy mark_rodata_ro() should be static
Next by thread: Re: [-mm patch] init/main.c: dummy mark_rodata_ro() should be static
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]