Re: [-mm patch] init/main.c: dummy mark_rodata_ro() should be static

On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 11:54:40PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
 > On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 02:46:51PM -0800, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
 > > On Wed, 23 Nov 2005, Adrian Bunk wrote:
 > > 
 > > > Every inline dummy function should be static.
 > > 
 > > Please explain why it matters in this case.
 > 
 > We don't need an additional global copy of the function.

it's an empty body, surely the compiler will compile it away ?

		Dave

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [-mm patch] init/main.c: dummy mark_rodata_ro() should be static
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
  • Re: [-mm patch] init/main.c: dummy mark_rodata_ro() should be static
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• References:
  • 2.6.15-rc2-mm1
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • [-mm patch] init/main.c: dummy mark_rodata_ro() should be static
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
  • Re: [-mm patch] init/main.c: dummy mark_rodata_ro() should be static
    • From: "Randy.Dunlap" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [-mm patch] init/main.c: dummy mark_rodata_ro() should be static
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: What protection does sysfs_readdir have with SMP/Preemption?
• Next by Date: is_aligned_hugepage_range() cleanup
• Previous by thread: Re: [-mm patch] init/main.c: dummy mark_rodata_ro() should be static
• Next by thread: Re: [-mm patch] init/main.c: dummy mark_rodata_ro() should be static
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]