Pavel Machek wrote:
Yes, hopefully users will not notice.
? So the idea is to merge inferior code and "hope users won't notice"?
Users might not notice that half their memory is gone, but they *will*
notice that their system is dog slow when it resumes because all their
caches are gone and a most of their stuff is swapped out.
Non-responsive system on resume is one of the main reasons that swsusp2
is much better than swsusp1, and yes, users *do* notice (I was one of
them, as I pointed out a while back). Yes, 50% is better than nothing,
but it's still a pretty poor show.
Seen from the perspective of a user, the situation is simple: suspend2
works, it's fast, and it's rock-solid. Just use it.
Regards,
Lorenzo
P.S. Don't "show me the code" me. I can't write the code. :-) But based
on what I see of how well suspend2 works, I think Nigel can...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
