On St 23-11-05 11:16:27, Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
> Pavel Machek wrote:
> >Yes, hopefully users will not notice.
>
> ? So the idea is to merge inferior code and "hope users won't notice"?
>
> Users might not notice that half their memory is gone, but they *will*
> notice that their system is dog slow when it resumes because all their
> caches are gone and a most of their stuff is swapped out.
>
> Non-responsive system on resume is one of the main reasons that swsusp2
> is much better than swsusp1, and yes, users *do* notice (I was one of
> them, as I pointed out a while back). Yes, 50% is better than nothing,
> but it's still a pretty poor show.
Did you actually benchmark it?
> Seen from the perspective of a user, the situation is simple: suspend2
> works, it's fast, and it's rock-solid. Just use it.
About as helpful as "Windows XP works, it's fast, and it's
rock-solid".
Pavel
--
Thanks, Sharp!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
