Re: 2.6.14: CR4 not needed to be inspected on the 486 anymore?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:

On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Zachary Amsden wrote:

While this is at least no worse in the nested fault case than earlier kernels, I really wish I had one of those weird 486s so I could test the faulting mechanism. It seems the trap handling code has gotten quite

What's so weird about 486s?  Besides, for testing it doesn't have to be
one -- you will get away with a 386, too.  I have neither anymore, but
there are people around still using them.

Because I hold in my hand "i486 Microprocessor Programmer's Reference Manual, c 1990", and it has no mention whatsoever of CR4, and all documentation I had until Friday had either no mention of CR4, or something to the effect of "new on Pentium, the CR4 register ..." So I've had to re-adjust my definition of 486, which was weird.

Zach
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux