On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Zachary Amsden wrote: > While this is at least no worse in the nested fault case than earlier > kernels, I really wish I had one of those weird 486s so I could test the > faulting mechanism. It seems the trap handling code has gotten quite What's so weird about 486s? Besides, for testing it doesn't have to be one -- you will get away with a 386, too. I have neither anymore, but there are people around still using them. Maciej - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2.6.14: CR4 not needed to be inspected on the 486 anymore?
- From: Zachary Amsden <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.14: CR4 not needed to be inspected on the 486 anymore?
- References:
- 2.6.14: CR4 not needed to be inspected on the 486 anymore?
- From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.14: CR4 not needed to be inspected on the 486 anymore?
- From: Zachary Amsden <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.14: CR4 not needed to be inspected on the 486 anymore?
- From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.14: CR4 not needed to be inspected on the 486 anymore?
- From: Zachary Amsden <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.14: CR4 not needed to be inspected on the 486 anymore?
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.14: CR4 not needed to be inspected on the 486 anymore?
- From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.14: CR4 not needed to be inspected on the 486 anymore?
- From: Zachary Amsden <[email protected]>
- 2.6.14: CR4 not needed to be inspected on the 486 anymore?
- Prev by Date: Re: 3D video card recommendations
- Next by Date: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Ubuntu kernel tree
- Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.14: CR4 not needed to be inspected on the 486 anymore?
- Next by thread: Re: 2.6.14: CR4 not needed to be inspected on the 486 anymore?
- Index(es):
 |