Re: [ANNOUNCE] Ubuntu kernel tree

• To: [email protected], [email protected]
• Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Ubuntu kernel tree
• From: Xose Vazquez Perez <[email protected]>
• Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:44:44 +0100
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=XUBShMKblZMqw0RfAd7yndzrrFuCRQHozFbVS2Kf9nCOwjLTvwKeBfwcCpvMXZphMph2BNf2bvRbMkJAvUlLgIm+jG2VbSkXPmHtarebFMwgaORDmMujpwPKFOJfigt3mYUGF7XT5KhW3rgFuLkGXU/ojA+NTBOtTByNPgpEPvw=
• Sender: [email protected]

Daniel Drake wrote:

> Is there an easier way to see what redhat/fedora have patched in, short of  finding the closest vanilla tree and using "diff"?

[ http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/kernel/ ]

--
Romanes eunt domus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Prev by Date: Re: [Lhms-devel] [PATCH 0/7] Fragmentation Avoidance V19
• Next by Date: Re: 2.6.14: CR4 not needed to be inspected on the 486 anymore?
• Previous by thread: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Ubuntu kernel tree
• Next by thread: [patch 2.6.14] fec_8xx: make CONFIG_FEC_8XX depend on CONFIG_8xx
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]