Re: [PATCH 1/2] slob: introduce mm/util.c for shared functions

On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 09:13:57PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Matt Mackall <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >  Add mm/util.c for functions common between SLAB and SLOB.
> 
> We should probably add a ppc32-developers-are-weenies warning to string.c

Well, yes. But I decided not to do that now because I ended up wanting
to create mm/util.c anyway for kzalloc. I suspect we'll see other
helper functions like kzalloc and kstrdup down the road.

Also, I haven't investigated the PPC entanglements too closely, but
converting it to use my cleaned up lib/inflate.c might reduce its
dependence on lib/string.c

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 1/2] slob: introduce mm/util.c for shared functions
    • From: Tom Rini <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/2] slob: introduce mm/util.c for shared functions
    • From: Pekka Enberg <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 1/2] slob: introduce mm/util.c for shared functions
    • From: Matt Mackall <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/2] slob: introduce mm/util.c for shared functions
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 9/12: eCryptfs] Inode operations
• Next by Date: mmc_block.c - cmd24/25 do not expect r1b
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/2] slob: introduce mm/util.c for shared functions
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/2] slob: introduce mm/util.c for shared functions
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]