Re: [PATCH 9/12: eCryptfs] Inode operations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Andreas Schwab wrote:

> James Morris <[email protected]> writes:
> 
> > On Wed, 2 Nov 2005, Phillip Hellewell wrote:
> >
> >> +static int grow_file(struct dentry *ecryptfs_dentry, struct file *lower_file,
> >> +		     struct inode *inode, struct inode *lower_inode)
> >> +{
> >> +	int rc = 0;
> >> +	struct file fake_file;
> >> +	memset(&fake_file, 0, sizeof(fake_file));
> >
> >
> > You don't need these initializations, bss is always initialized to zero 
> > in this environment.
> 
> Automatic variables are not related to the bss segment.

Yep, ignore whatever it was I was mis-thinking there.



- James
-- 
James Morris
<[email protected]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux