Re: [PATCH 1/2] slob: introduce mm/util.c for shared functions

On 11/4/05, Matt Mackall <[email protected]> wrote:
> Well, yes. But I decided not to do that now because I ended up wanting
> to create mm/util.c anyway for kzalloc. I suspect we'll see other
> helper functions like kzalloc and kstrdup down the road.

I prefer this as well. kstrdup() is _not_ a string operation but a
special purpose memory allocator just like kzalloc() and kcalloc().

                               Pekka
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] slob: introduce mm/util.c for shared functions
  - From: Paulo Marques <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH 1/2] slob: introduce mm/util.c for shared functions
  - From: Matt Mackall <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] slob: introduce mm/util.c for shared functions
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] slob: introduce mm/util.c for shared functions
  - From: Matt Mackall <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [patch] swapin rlimit
Next by Date: Re: [patch] swapin rlimit
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/2] slob: introduce mm/util.c for shared functions
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/2] slob: introduce mm/util.c for shared functions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]