> On Thursday 03 November 2005 12:51, Robert Schwebel wrote: > > [...] klibc didn't compile for ARCH=um. > I repeat my question: what is it that didn't compile, klibc or the kernel? come on, dude -- how much clearer can he be? - R. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: initramfs for /dev/console with udev?
- From: Rob Landley <[email protected]>
- Re: initramfs for /dev/console with udev?
- From: Rob Landley <[email protected]>
- Re: initramfs for /dev/console with udev?
- From: Rob Landley <[email protected]>
- Re: initramfs for /dev/console with udev?
- References:
- initramfs for /dev/console with udev?
- From: Robert Schwebel <[email protected]>
- Re: initramfs for /dev/console with udev?
- From: Rob Landley <[email protected]>
- Re: initramfs for /dev/console with udev?
- From: Robert Schwebel <[email protected]>
- Re: initramfs for /dev/console with udev?
- From: Rob Landley <[email protected]>
- initramfs for /dev/console with udev?
- Prev by Date: Re: NTP broken with 2.6.14
- Next by Date: Re: [Lhms-devel] [PATCH 0/7] Fragmentation Avoidance V19
- Previous by thread: Re: initramfs for /dev/console with udev?
- Next by thread: Re: initramfs for /dev/console with udev?
- Index(es):
 |