Re: initramfs for /dev/console with udev?

On Thursday 03 November 2005 13:57, Roland Dreier wrote:
>  > On Thursday 03 November 2005 12:51, Robert Schwebel wrote:
>  > > [...] klibc didn't compile for ARCH=um.
>  >
>  > I repeat my question: what is it that didn't compile, klibc or the
>  > kernel?
>
> come on, dude -- how much clearer can he be?

How do you feed ARCH=um to klibc?

Rob
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • initramfs for /dev/console with udev?
    • From: Robert Schwebel <[email protected]>
  • Re: initramfs for /dev/console with udev?
    • From: Rob Landley <[email protected]>
  • Re: initramfs for /dev/console with udev?
    • From: Roland Dreier <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: NTP broken with 2.6.14
• Next by Date: Re: [was Re: Linux 2.6.14 ] Revert "x86-64: Avoid unnecessary double bouncing for swiotlb"
• Previous by thread: Re: initramfs for /dev/console with udev?
• Next by thread: Re: initramfs for /dev/console with udev?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]