On Thursday 03 November 2005 13:57, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > On Thursday 03 November 2005 12:51, Robert Schwebel wrote:
> > > [...] klibc didn't compile for ARCH=um.
> >
> > I repeat my question: what is it that didn't compile, klibc or the
> > kernel?
>
> come on, dude -- how much clearer can he be?
And confirming:
cd ~
tar xvjf linux-2.6.14.tar.bz2
cd linux-2.6.14
make allyesconfig
cd ~
tar xvzf klibc-1.1.tar.gz
cd klibc-1.1
ln -s ~/linux-2.6.14/include/asm-i386 include/asm
ln -s ~/linux-2.6.14/include/asm-generic/ include/asm-generic
ln -s ~/linux-2.6.14/include/linux include/linux
make
Does indeed build klibc.
I get the strong feeling klibc-1.1 should be called klibc-2.6.14, but oh
well...
Rob
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]