Re: New (now current development process)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



    Linus> No, I think that's a lost cause.

    Linus> It doesn't grow by 700 bytes once in a while. It grows by
    Linus> much more, and much more often. And we can't fight it that
    Linus> way, that's just not going to work. Maybe have something
    Linus> that tracks individual object file sizes and shames people
    Linus> into not growing them..

I think we're actually agreeing.  My kmalloc/kzalloc patch is a cute
hack but magic tricks like that aren't going to shrink the kernel by
very much and it's probably not worth merging complications like that.

The way to a smaller kernel is for a lot of people to do a lot of hard
work and look at where we can trim fat.

For your last suggestion, maybe someone can automate running Andi's
bloat-o-meter?  I think the hard part is maintaining comparable configs.

 - R.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux