On Tue, 1 Nov 2005, Roland Dreier wrote: > > On an x86_64 allnoconfig kernel, I see the following sizes: > > text data bss dec hex filename > 795683 197356 116384 1109423 10edaf vmlinux-before > 794894 197420 116384 1108698 10eada vmlinux-after I really don't see the point of shaving less than a kB with ugly calling convention magic, when switching to -Os can save us much more, and when the networking code is several hundred kB. If we start doing size optimizations, we need to think big. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: New (now current development process)
- From: Roland Dreier <[email protected]>
- Re: New (now current development process)
- References:
- New (now current development process)
- From: Paolo Ciarrocchi <[email protected]>
- Re: New (now current development process)
- From: Russell King <[email protected]>
- Re: New (now current development process)
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: New (now current development process)
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: New (now current development process)
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: New (now current development process)
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: New (now current development process)
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: New (now current development process)
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: New (now current development process)
- From: Roland Dreier <[email protected]>
- New (now current development process)
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Swap Migration V5: Overview
- Next by Date: Re: [git tree] drm tree for 2.6.15
- Previous by thread: Re: New (now current development process)
- Next by thread: Re: New (now current development process)
- Index(es):
 |