On Mon, 31 Oct 2005, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Are you sure these kernels are feature-equivalent? They may not be feature-equivalent in reality, but it's hard to generate something that has the features (or lack there-of) of old kernels these days. Which is problematic. But some of it is likely also compilers. gcc does insane padding in many cases these days. And a lot of it is us just being bloated. Argh. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: New (now current development process)
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: New (now current development process)
- From: Rob Landley <[email protected]>
- Re: New (now current development process)
- From: Russell King <[email protected]>
- Re: New (now current development process)
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: New (now current development process)
- References:
- New (now current development process)
- From: Paolo Ciarrocchi <[email protected]>
- Re: New (now current development process)
- From: Russell King <[email protected]>
- Re: New (now current development process)
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: New (now current development process)
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: New (now current development process)
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: New (now current development process)
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- New (now current development process)
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] tpm: support PPC64 hardware
- Next by Date: Re: New (now current development process)
- Previous by thread: Re: New (now current development process)
- Next by thread: Re: New (now current development process)
- Index(es):
 |