Re: [ckrm-tech] Re: [PATCH 00/02] Process Events Connector

* Matt Helsley ([email protected]) wrote:
> 	It seems to me that this is the consensus here and on LSE-Tech.
> This patch addresses the needs of ELSA and CKRM and is amenable to using
> the patches recently proposed on lse-tech to pull out the common piece.

Sounds good.  What about the SGI needs (for PAGG)?  They just posted
pnotify pretty recently.   Or is that what you mean by consensus and
possible use of 'task notifiers'?

thanks,
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [ckrm-tech] Re: [PATCH 00/02] Process Events Connector
    • From: Matt Helsley <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 00/02] Process Events Connector
    • From: Matt Helsley <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 00/02] Process Events Connector
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 00/02] Process Events Connector
    • From: Matt Helsley <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 00/02] Process Events Connector
    • From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
  • Re: [ckrm-tech] Re: [PATCH 00/02] Process Events Connector
    • From: Matt Helsley <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [ckrm-tech] Re: [PATCH 00/02] Process Events Connector
• Next by Date: RFC: Cleanup / small fixes to hugetlb fault handling
• Previous by thread: Re: [ckrm-tech] Re: [PATCH 00/02] Process Events Connector
• Next by thread: Re: [ckrm-tech] Re: [PATCH 00/02] Process Events Connector
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]