On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 05:07:40PM -0700, Matt Helsley wrote:
> Andrew, all,
>
> Is there any reason this patch could not go for a spin in a -mm tree?
> It's similar to Guillaume's fork connector patch which did appear in -mm
> at one point. It replaces the fork_advisor patch that ELSA is currently
> using, can be used by userspace CKRM code, and in general is useful for
> anything that may wish to monitor changes in all processes.
Why can't you use a lsm module for this instead? It looks like you are
wanting to hook things in pretty much the same places we currently have
the lsm hooks at.
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
