On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 18:22 -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Matt Helsley ([email protected]) wrote:
> > This patch does not affect whether or not these operations succeed and
> > hence is a poor match for LSM even though it hooks into the same places
> > in the kernel.
>
> That's correct. There's no access control happening here, so it's a
> poor fit. There's all that ELSA, PAGG, CKRM, etc that want this kind of
> stuff. I'd recommended numerous times to find a common piece for those
> users.
>
> thanks,
> -chris
It seems to me that this is the consensus here and on LSE-Tech.
This patch addresses the needs of ELSA and CKRM and is amenable to using
the patches recently proposed on lse-tech to pull out the common piece.
Cheers,
-Matt Helsley
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
