Re: [PATCH 02/02] cpuset automatic numa mempolicy rebinding

Dave wrote:
> I really just meant it was hard to read having two braces at the same
> level.  This was due to the extra block inside of the switch() ...

Ah - yes.  That.

Such is life.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <[email protected]> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH 01/02] cpuset bitmap and mask remap operators
  - From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 02/02] cpuset automatic numa mempolicy rebinding
  - From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 02/02] cpuset automatic numa mempolicy rebinding
  - From: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 02/02] cpuset automatic numa mempolicy rebinding
  - From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 02/02] cpuset automatic numa mempolicy rebinding
  - From: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] RCU torture-testing kernel module
Next by Date: Re: ioctls, etc. (was Re: [PATCH 1/4] sas: add flag for locally attached PHYs)
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 02/02] cpuset automatic numa mempolicy rebinding
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 01/02] cpuset bitmap and mask remap operators
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]