Re: [PATCH 02/02] cpuset automatic numa mempolicy rebinding

On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 00:27 -0700, Paul Jackson wrote:
> +               break;
> +       }
> +       default:
> +               BUG();
> +               break;
> +       }
> +}

Just think how that looks to a reviewer without the full context :)

Perhaps the MBOL_BIND case needs a little helper function.

-- Dave

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 02/02] cpuset automatic numa mempolicy rebinding
    • From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 01/02] cpuset bitmap and mask remap operators
    • From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 02/02] cpuset automatic numa mempolicy rebinding
    • From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 01/02] cpuset bitmap and mask remap operators
• Next by Date: 2.6.14-rc5-mm1
• Previous by thread: [PATCH 02/02] cpuset automatic numa mempolicy rebinding
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 02/02] cpuset automatic numa mempolicy rebinding
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]