Re: [PATCH 02/02] cpuset automatic numa mempolicy rebinding

Dave wrote:
> Just think how that looks to a reviewer without the full context :)

I was just copying Andi's coding style for these cases, with
this BUG() if no policy matched.  When in Rome, do as the
Romans.

> Perhaps the MBOL_BIND case needs a little helper function.

Eh ... that entire routine still fits on a page of my screen.
I'm not sure that adding a helper function would clarify the
code any.

Thanks for looking at it.  If you're pretty sure I should change
one of the above, squeek a little louder.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <[email protected]> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 02/02] cpuset automatic numa mempolicy rebinding
  - From: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH 01/02] cpuset bitmap and mask remap operators
  - From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 02/02] cpuset automatic numa mempolicy rebinding
  - From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 02/02] cpuset automatic numa mempolicy rebinding
  - From: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [KORG] [RFC] Useful tools section on kernel.org?
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 02/02] cpuset automatic numa mempolicy rebinding
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 02/02] cpuset automatic numa mempolicy rebinding
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 02/02] cpuset automatic numa mempolicy rebinding
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]