On Thu, 20 Oct 2005, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > +/* > + * We inline the unlock functions in the nondebug case: > + */ > +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK That can't be right. What about preemption etc? There's a lot more to spin_unlock() than just the debugging stuff. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- i386 spinlock fairness: bizarre test results
- From: Chuck Ebbert <[email protected]>
- Re: i386 spinlock fairness: bizarre test results
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: i386 spinlock fairness: bizarre test results
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] i386 spinlocks should use the full 32 bits, not only 8 bits
- From: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] i386 spinlocks should use the full 32 bits, not only 8 bits
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] i386 spinlocks should use the full 32 bits, not only 8 bits
- From: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] i386 spinlocks should use the full 32 bits, not only 8 bits
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] i386 spinlocks should use the full 32 bits, not only 8 bits
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] i386 spinlocks should use the full 32 bits, not only 8 bits
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- i386 spinlock fairness: bizarre test results
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] fix vgacon blanking
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] added sysdev attribute to sysdev show/store methods - for linux-2.6.13.4
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] i386 spinlocks should use the full 32 bits, not only 8 bits
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] i386 spinlocks should use the full 32 bits, not only 8 bits
- Index(es):
 |