On Thu, 20 Oct 2005, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> On Thu, 20 Oct 2005, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >
> > FYI, I just merged my changes with -rt13 and everything seems to be
> > working very smoothly. I've been running my kernel over an hour without
> > showing the backward times. I haven't even added the change from cycle_t
> > to be 64 bits.
> >
> >
> > So, knock on wood, maybe one of the latest updates fixed the problem. Or
> > maybe as soon as I hit send, the machine will crash.
> >
> > I'll keep you all posted.
> >
>
> Spoke too soon ;-)
>
> About ten minutes after sending this, the clock went backwards, and once
> again by 2 seconds.
>
> now=5856:283756196 last_count=5858:436968526
>
> Where now is 5856.283756196 seconds and last count is 5858.436968526.
>
Pádraig sent me an email showing that this time difference is what it
would take a 2GHz machine to overflow a 32 bit number. I'll go and switch
the cycle_t to 64 bits and see if this solves the problem.
-- Steve
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]