Dimitri Sivanich a écrit :
Just bringing up a latency issue I've noticed recently.
In or around 2.6.14-rc4 some changes were made to have the call to
kmem_cache_free() from file_free() in the Linux kernel be deferred, running
as a tasklet via file_free_rcu(), rather than running kmem_cache_free()
right from file_free() directly.
I've noticed that rcu_process_callbacks() can take quite a while to run
now that it routinely calls file_free_rcu() to run kmem_cache_free().
This can make the cpu unavailable for 100's of usec on 1GHz machines, with
or without preemption configured on (much of this path is non-preemptible).
This can result in some unpredictable periods of fairly long cpu latency,
such as when a thread is waiting to be woken by an interrupt handler on a
'now quiet' cpu. Changing file_free() to call kmem_cache_free() directly
completely eliminates this unexpected latency.
Well, you cannot change file_free() to call kmem_cache_free() directly, or
risk corruption/crash.
See Documentation/RCU/UP.txt
Dont you notice latency issue with other RCU protected data, like dentries ?
BTW a change in 2.6.14-rc5 might give different latency results.
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]