On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 10:59 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> I switched my custom kernel timer to use the ktimers with the prio of -1
> as you mentioned to me offline. I set up the timer to be monotonic and
> have a requirement that the returned time is always greater or equal to
> the last time returned from do_get_ktime_mono.
>
> Now here's the results that I got between two calls of do_get_ktime_mono
>
> 358.069795728 secs then later 355.981483177. Should this ever happen?
Definitely not. monotonic time must go forwards.
> I haven't look to see if this happens in vanilla -rt10 but I haven't
> touched your ktimer code except for my logging and the patch with the
> unlock_ktimer_base (since I was based off of -rt9)
The ktimer code itself calls the timeofday code, which provides the
monotonic clock. I have no idea what might go wrong.
Is this reproducible ?
tglx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]