On Thu, 20 Oct 2005, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > isnt cycle_t 64 bits? > > > > Not anymore. > > include/linux/time.h: > > /* timeofday base types */ > typedef s64 nsec_t; > typedef unsigned long cycle_t; > At least not on a 32 bit machine. -- Steve - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Ktimer / -rt9 (+custom) monotonic_clock going backwards.
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: Ktimer / -rt9 (+custom) monotonic_clock going backwards.
- From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
- Re: Ktimer / -rt9 (+custom) monotonic_clock going backwards.
- From: john stultz <[email protected]>
- Re: Ktimer / -rt9 (+custom) monotonic_clock going backwards.
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: Ktimer / -rt9 (+custom) monotonic_clock going backwards.
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: Ktimer / -rt9 (+custom) monotonic_clock going backwards.
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: Ktimer / -rt9 (+custom) monotonic_clock going backwards.
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: Ktimer / -rt9 (+custom) monotonic_clock going backwards.
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: Ktimer / -rt9 (+custom) monotonic_clock going backwards.
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: Ktimer / -rt9 (+custom) monotonic_clock going backwards.
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Ktimer / -rt9 (+custom) monotonic_clock going backwards.
- Prev by Date: Re: Ktimer / -rt9 (+custom) monotonic_clock going backwards.
- Next by Date: low speed PAE in 2.4.31
- Previous by thread: Re: Ktimer / -rt9 (+custom) monotonic_clock going backwards.
- Next by thread: Re: Ktimer / -rt9 (+custom) monotonic_clock going backwards.
- Index(es):