Re: Ktimer / -rt9 (+custom) monotonic_clock going backwards.

[john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>]

On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 17:10 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 10:59 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > Hi Thomas,
> > 
> > I switched my custom kernel timer to use the ktimers with the prio of -1
> > as you mentioned to me offline.  I set up the timer to be monotonic and
> > have a requirement that the returned time is always greater or equal to
> > the last time returned from do_get_ktime_mono.
> > 
> > Now here's the results that I got between two calls of do_get_ktime_mono
> > 
> > 358.069795728 secs then later 355.981483177.  Should this ever happen?
> 
> Definitely not. monotonic time must go forwards. 

Steven: What clocksource are you using? Could you send me your dmesg?


> > I haven't look to see if this happens in vanilla -rt10 but I haven't
> > touched your ktimer code except for my logging and the patch with the
> > unlock_ktimer_base (since I was based off of -rt9)
> 
> The ktimer code itself calls the timeofday code, which provides the
> monotonic clock. I have no idea what might go wrong. 
> 
> Is this reproducible ?

Last night I just caught a bug I accidentally introduced with the fixed
interval math (oh, if only optimizations didn't dirty code so!), where
time inconsistencies were possible when clocksources were changed. I'm
not sure if that's the issue being seen above, but I'll wrap things up
and send out a B8 release today if I can.

thanks
-john

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/