Re: [discuss] Re: [Patch] x86, x86_64: Intel HT, Multi core detection code cleanup

> I can fix the API mess. Is there anything else you want me to do?

I think you overdid the sharing. Can you limit it to one file
and copy the stuff that doesn't fit easily? 

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [discuss] Re: [Patch] x86, x86_64: Intel HT, Multi core detection code cleanup
    • From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [Patch] x86, x86_64: Intel HT, Multi core detection code cleanup
    • From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Patch] x86, x86_64: Intel HT, Multi core detection code cleanup
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Patch] x86, x86_64: Intel HT, Multi core detection code cleanup
    • From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Suspend to RAM broken with 2.6.13
• Next by Date: Re: [Keyrings] [PATCH] Keys: Add LSM hooks for key management
• Previous by thread: Re: [Patch] x86, x86_64: Intel HT, Multi core detection code cleanup
• Next by thread: Re: [discuss] Re: [Patch] x86, x86_64: Intel HT, Multi core detection code cleanup
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]