> I can fix the API mess. Is there anything else you want me to do? I think you overdid the sharing. Can you limit it to one file and copy the stuff that doesn't fit easily? -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [discuss] Re: [Patch] x86, x86_64: Intel HT, Multi core detection code cleanup
- From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <[email protected]>
- Re: [discuss] Re: [Patch] x86, x86_64: Intel HT, Multi core detection code cleanup
- References:
- [Patch] x86, x86_64: Intel HT, Multi core detection code cleanup
- From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <[email protected]>
- Re: [Patch] x86, x86_64: Intel HT, Multi core detection code cleanup
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [Patch] x86, x86_64: Intel HT, Multi core detection code cleanup
- From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <[email protected]>
- [Patch] x86, x86_64: Intel HT, Multi core detection code cleanup
- Prev by Date: Re: Suspend to RAM broken with 2.6.13
- Next by Date: Re: [Keyrings] [PATCH] Keys: Add LSM hooks for key management
- Previous by thread: Re: [Patch] x86, x86_64: Intel HT, Multi core detection code cleanup
- Next by thread: Re: [discuss] Re: [Patch] x86, x86_64: Intel HT, Multi core detection code cleanup
- Index(es):
 |