Re: [Patch] x86, x86_64: Intel HT, Multi core detection code cleanup

On Thursday 06 October 2005 01:17, Siddha, Suresh B wrote:

> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_HT
> +#ifndef CONFIG_X86_64
> +#include <mach_apic.h>
> +#else
> +#include <asm/mach_apic.h>
> +#endif

Having such ifdefs is a clear cue that the code shouldn't be shared
between architectures.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [Patch] x86, x86_64: Intel HT, Multi core detection code cleanup
    • From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [Patch] x86, x86_64: Intel HT, Multi core detection code cleanup
    • From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] 2.6.13 - output of /proc/maps on nommu systems is incomplete
• Next by Date: Re: [swsusp] separate snapshot functionality to separate file
• Previous by thread: [Patch] x86, x86_64: Intel HT, Multi core detection code cleanup
• Next by thread: Re: [Patch] x86, x86_64: Intel HT, Multi core detection code cleanup
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]