Re: [PATCH 0/3] netfilter : 3 patches to boost ip_tables performance

On Wed, 21 Sep 2005, David S. Miller wrote:

> From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
> Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 15:43:29 -0700 (PDT)
> 
> > Maybe we better introduce vmalloc_node() instead of improvising this for 
> > several subsystems? The e1000 driver has similar issues.
> 
> I agree.

I did an implementation in June.

See http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-mm&m=111766643127530&w=2

Not sure if this will fit the bill. Never really tested it.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] netfilter : 3 patches to boost ip_tables performance
  - From: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH] Adds sys_set_mempolicy() in include/linux/syscalls.h
  - From: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 0/3] netfilter : 3 patches to boost ip_tables performance
  - From: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] netfilter : 3 patches to boost ip_tables performance
  - From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] netfilter : 3 patches to boost ip_tables performance
  - From: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] RT: Checks for cmpxchg in get_task_struct_rcu()
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] RT: Checks for cmpxchg in get_task_struct_rcu()
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/3] netfilter : 3 patches to boost ip_tables performance
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/3] netfilter : 3 patches to boost ip_tables performance
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind]