On Thu, 2005-09-22 at 10:59 +1000, Nick Piggin wrote: > You need my atomic_cmpxchg patches that provide an atomic_cmpxchg > (and atomic_inc_not_zero) for all architectures. > It is racy, but why not just disable preemption .. Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] RT: Checks for cmpxchg in get_task_struct_rcu()
- From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] RT: Checks for cmpxchg in get_task_struct_rcu()
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] RT: Checks for cmpxchg in get_task_struct_rcu()
- References:
- [PATCH] RT: Checks for cmpxchg in get_task_struct_rcu()
- From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] RT: Checks for cmpxchg in get_task_struct_rcu()
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] RT: Checks for cmpxchg in get_task_struct_rcu()
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/3] netfilter : 3 patches to boost ip_tables performance
- Next by Date: DMA broken in mainline 2.6.13.2 _AND_ opensuse vendor 2.6.13-15
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] RT: Checks for cmpxchg in get_task_struct_rcu()
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] RT: Checks for cmpxchg in get_task_struct_rcu()
- Index(es):
