From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]> Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 15:43:29 -0700 (PDT) > Maybe we better introduce vmalloc_node() instead of improvising this for > several subsystems? The e1000 driver has similar issues. I agree. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] netfilter : 3 patches to boost ip_tables performance
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] netfilter : 3 patches to boost ip_tables performance
- References:
- [PATCH] Adds sys_set_mempolicy() in include/linux/syscalls.h
- From: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 0/3] netfilter : 3 patches to boost ip_tables performance
- From: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] netfilter : 3 patches to boost ip_tables performance
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] Adds sys_set_mempolicy() in include/linux/syscalls.h
- Prev by Date: Re: Query: How fix: `ide_generic_all_on' defined but not used??
- Next by Date: Re: readme-update-from-the-stone-age.patch added to -mm tree
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/3] netfilter : 3 patches to boost ip_tables performance
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/3] netfilter : 3 patches to boost ip_tables performance
- Index(es):
