Lennart Sorensen wrote:
>
> Neither was ready for use when they were
>included in the kernel and should probably have had big warning signs in
>the kernel config for them.
>
>
They did have warning signs: they were labeled experimental.... as is
reiser4.
At some point developers and their limited size mailing list simply
cannot make things crash, and then it needs to go in to the main kernel
labeled experimental.
Of course, the reiser4 code is not as stable as it was before the
changes Christoph asked for.
Hans
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |