Re: I request inclusion of reiser4 in the mainline kernel

On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 01:56:14PM +0300, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> At least reiser4 is smaller. IIRC xfs is older than reiser4 and had more time
> to optimize code size, but:
> 
> reiser4        2557872 bytes
> xfs            3306782 bytes

and romfs is smaller than ext2, damn.  Should we remove all filesystems but
romfs now?


and yeah, if you didn't get the hint compare the feature sets.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: I request inclusion of reiser4 in the mainline kernel
    • From: David Masover <[email protected]>

• References:
  • I request inclusion of reiser4 in the mainline kernel
    • From: Hans Reiser <[email protected]>
  • Re: I request inclusion of reiser4 in the mainline kernel
    • From: Hans Reiser <[email protected]>
  • Re: I request inclusion of reiser4 in the mainline kernel
    • From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
  • Re: I request inclusion of reiser4 in the mainline kernel
    • From: Denis Vlasenko <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: I request inclusion of reiser4 in the mainline kernel
• Next by Date: Re: I request inclusion of reiser4 in the mainline kernel
• Previous by thread: Re: I request inclusion of reiser4 in the mainline kernel
• Next by thread: Re: I request inclusion of reiser4 in the mainline kernel
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]