Re: I request inclusion of reiser4 in the mainline kernel

[Denis Vlasenko <vda@ilport.com.ua>]

On Saturday 17 September 2005 12:22, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 12:39:48PM -0700, Hans Reiser wrote:
> > Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > 
> > >additinoal comment is that the code is very messy, very different
> > >from normal kernel style, full of indirections and thus hard to read.
> > >
> > 
> > Most of my customers remark that Namesys code is head and shoulders
> > above the rest of the kernel code.  So yes, it is different.  In
> > particular, they cite the XFS code as being so incredibly hard to read
> > that its unreadability is worth hundreds of thousands of dollars in
> > license fees for me.  That's cash received, from persons who read it
> > all, not commentary made idly.
> 
> It's very different from kernel style, and it's hard to read for us kernel
> developers.  And yes, I don't think XFS is the most easy to read code either,
> quite contrary.  But it's at least half a magnitude less bad than reiser4
> code..

At least reiser4 is smaller. IIRC xfs is older than reiser4 and had more time
to optimize code size, but:

reiser4        2557872 bytes
xfs            3306782 bytes
--
vda
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/