Re: [PATCH] use kzalloc instead of malloc+memset

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Monday 12 September 2005 23:43, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > On 9/13/05, Jiri Slaby <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >-      cls = kmalloc(sizeof(struct class), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > >+      cls = kzalloc(sizeof(struct class), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > >
> > > >
> > > maybe, the better way is to write `*cls' instead of `struct class',
> > > better for further changes
> > 
> > Please note that some maintainers don't like it. I at least could not
> > sneak in patches like these to drivers/usb/ because I had changed
> > sizeof.
> > 
> 
> And given the fact that Greg maintains driver core it probably won't be
> accepted here either :)
> 
> FWIW I also prefer spelling out the structure I am allocating.
> 

It hurts readability.  Quick question: is this code correct?

	dev = kmalloc(sizeof(struct net_device), GFP_KERNEL);

you don't know.  You have to go hunting down the declaration of `dev' to
find out.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]
  Powered by Linux