Re: [PATCH] cpuset semaphore depth check deadlock fix

> The global owner was insufficient because it wasn't

Oops - meant to say:

> The global depth was insufficient because it wasn't

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <[email protected]> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH] cpuset semaphore depth check deadlock fix
  - From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] cpuset semaphore depth check deadlock fix
  - From: Nikita Danilov <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] cpuset semaphore depth check deadlock fix
  - From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: pm_register should die
Next by Date: Re: pm_register should die
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] cpuset semaphore depth check deadlock fix
Next by thread: [PATCH 2/8] cciss:busy_initializing flag
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind]