Re: pm_register should die

Hi!

> > +#ifdef CONFIG_OLD_PM
> >   	if (pm_send_all(PM_SUSPEND, (void *)3)) {
> 
> Can we not do this without ifdefs?
> 
> #define pm_send_all(foo, bar) 0

Okay, we probably can, but the ifdefs make very nice/easy markers
"this is going away". I'd prefer to actually delete all the code
inside those ifdefs...

I agree this patch can be improved... I hope I can get people to fix
those 13 occurences and be able to just drop everything in #ifdef
_OLD_PM.

								Pavel

-- 
if you have sharp zaurus hardware you don't need... you know my address
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: pm_register should die
    • From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>

• References:
  • pm_register should die
    • From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
  • Re: pm_register should die
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] include: pci_find_device remove (include/asm-i386/ide.h)
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] cpuset semaphore depth check deadlock fix
• Previous by thread: Re: pm_register should die
• Next by thread: Re: pm_register should die
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]