Andrew Morton wrote:
Should we also decrease the polling interval? Perhaps only when the cable is unplugged?
Sounds like a plan. 60 seconds certainly strikes me as being very slow. OTOH, I'm not aware of the reasoning behind this choice in the first place. It might make sense for some odd setups. Since I don't even have any HW to play around with, I think I'll step down for now. -Tommy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] 3c59x: read current link status from phy
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] 3c59x: read current link status from phy
- References:
- Re: [PATCH] 3c59x: read current link status from phy
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] 3c59x: read current link status from phy
- From: Bogdan Costescu <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] 3c59x: read current link status from phy
- From: Tommy Christensen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] 3c59x: read current link status from phy
- From: Bogdan Costescu <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] 3c59x: read current link status from phy
- From: Tommy Christensen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] 3c59x: read current link status from phy
- From: Bogdan Costescu <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] 3c59x: read current link status from phy
- From: Tommy Christensen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] 3c59x: read current link status from phy
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] 3c59x: read current link status from phy
- Prev by Date: Re: [ckrm-tech] Re: [PATCH 0/5] SUBCPUSETS: a resource control functionality using CPUSETS
- Next by Date: RE: can't boot 2.6.13
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] 3c59x: read current link status from phy
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] 3c59x: read current link status from phy
- Index(es):
