Tommy Christensen <[email protected]> wrote: > > In order to spare some I/O operations, be more intelligent about > when to read from the PHY. Seems sane. Should we also decrease the polling interval? Perhaps only when the cable is unplugged? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] 3c59x: read current link status from phy
- From: Tommy Christensen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] 3c59x: read current link status from phy
- References:
- Re: [PATCH] 3c59x: read current link status from phy
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] 3c59x: read current link status from phy
- From: Bogdan Costescu <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] 3c59x: read current link status from phy
- From: Tommy Christensen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] 3c59x: read current link status from phy
- From: Bogdan Costescu <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] 3c59x: read current link status from phy
- From: Tommy Christensen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] 3c59x: read current link status from phy
- From: Bogdan Costescu <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] 3c59x: read current link status from phy
- From: Tommy Christensen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] 3c59x: read current link status from phy
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] 3c59x: read current link status from phy
- Next by Date: RE: can't boot 2.6.13
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] 3c59x: read current link status from phy
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] 3c59x: read current link status from phy
- Index(es):
