Re: [RFC - 0/9] Generic timekeeping subsystem (v. B5)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 

On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 02:45 +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, john stultz wrote:
> 
> > Ok, well, I'm still at a loss for understanding how this avoids my
> > concern about time inconsistencies.
> 
> Let's take a simple example to demonstrate the difference between system 
> time and reference time.

[snip]

> 		17000		16974		8	-26
> 18		18000		17958		8	-42
> 19		19000		18942		8	-58
> 20		20000		19926		8	-74
> 
> let's assume we're late with the update by 10 cycles 
> (gettimeofday=19926+10*8=20006), so a change to the mult also requires a 
> adjustment of the system time:
> 
> 20+10		20000		19916		9	-84
> 
> so gettimeofday=19916+10*9=20006

Hey Roman, 
	Thanks for your patient persistence. The light bulb finally clicked on
for me last night. I'll start playing with the idea and get back to
you. 

thanks again,
-john

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]
  Powered by Linux