Hi, On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, john stultz wrote: > In the case above, you're accumulating in fixed cycle intervals. This > does avoid having to do the mult/shift combo each interrupt, however > since you do not accumulate the entire interval, and there is some > sub-tick remainder in cycle_offset. We have to ensure that that sub-tick > remainder is accumulated at the next interrupt using the same ntp > adjustment it would use in a call to gettimeofday() just prior to this > interrupt. Look closer and you'll notice that the cycle_offset remainder isn't lost. :) bye, Roman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC - 0/9] Generic timekeeping subsystem (v. B5)
- From: john stultz <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC - 0/9] Generic timekeeping subsystem (v. B5)
- References:
- [RFC - 0/13] NTP cleanup work (v. B5)
- From: john stultz <[email protected]>
- [RFC - 0/9] Generic timekeeping subsystem (v. B5)
- From: john stultz <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC - 0/9] Generic timekeeping subsystem (v. B5)
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC - 0/9] Generic timekeeping subsystem (v. B5)
- From: john stultz <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC - 0/9] Generic timekeeping subsystem (v. B5)
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC - 0/9] Generic timekeeping subsystem (v. B5)
- From: john stultz <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC - 0/9] Generic timekeeping subsystem (v. B5)
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC - 0/9] Generic timekeeping subsystem (v. B5)
- From: john stultz <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC - 0/9] Generic timekeeping subsystem (v. B5)
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC - 0/9] Generic timekeeping subsystem (v. B5)
- From: john stultz <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC - 0/9] Generic timekeeping subsystem (v. B5)
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC - 0/9] Generic timekeeping subsystem (v. B5)
- From: john stultz <[email protected]>
- [RFC - 0/13] NTP cleanup work (v. B5)
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.12 Performance problems
- Next by Date: Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: [Alsa drivers] Creatives X-Fi chip
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC - 0/9] Generic timekeeping subsystem (v. B5)
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC - 0/9] Generic timekeeping subsystem (v. B5)
- Index(es):