Hi, On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, john stultz wrote: > from your example: > > // at init: system_update = update_cycles * mult; > > system_time += system_update; > > and: > > error = system_time - (xtime.tv_nsec << shift); > > This doesn't seem to make sense with the above. Could you clarify? The example here doesn't keep the complete system time, just enough to compute the difference. bye, Roman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC - 0/9] Generic timekeeping subsystem (v. B5)
- From: john stultz <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC - 0/9] Generic timekeeping subsystem (v. B5)
- References:
- [RFC - 0/13] NTP cleanup work (v. B5)
- From: john stultz <[email protected]>
- [RFC - 0/9] Generic timekeeping subsystem (v. B5)
- From: john stultz <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC - 0/9] Generic timekeeping subsystem (v. B5)
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC - 0/9] Generic timekeeping subsystem (v. B5)
- From: john stultz <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC - 0/9] Generic timekeeping subsystem (v. B5)
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC - 0/9] Generic timekeeping subsystem (v. B5)
- From: john stultz <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC - 0/9] Generic timekeeping subsystem (v. B5)
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC - 0/9] Generic timekeeping subsystem (v. B5)
- From: john stultz <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC - 0/9] Generic timekeeping subsystem (v. B5)
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC - 0/9] Generic timekeeping subsystem (v. B5)
- From: john stultz <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC - 0/9] Generic timekeeping subsystem (v. B5)
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC - 0/9] Generic timekeeping subsystem (v. B5)
- From: john stultz <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC - 0/9] Generic timekeeping subsystem (v. B5)
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC - 0/9] Generic timekeeping subsystem (v. B5)
- From: john stultz <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC - 0/9] Generic timekeeping subsystem (v. B5)
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC - 0/9] Generic timekeeping subsystem (v. B5)
- From: john stultz <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC - 0/9] Generic timekeeping subsystem (v. B5)
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC - 0/9] Generic timekeeping subsystem (v. B5)
- From: john stultz <[email protected]>
- [RFC - 0/13] NTP cleanup work (v. B5)
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/5] Add pagetable allocation notifiers
- Next by Date: Re: question on memory barrier
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC - 0/9] Generic timekeeping subsystem (v. B5)
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC - 0/9] Generic timekeeping subsystem (v. B5)
- Index(es):