Davide Libenzi wrote:
I am using linux-2.6.11 and glibc-2.3.4 .. and using select() in it's place seems to work fine. Are there any known issues with say, one thread does epoll_wait()s while other threads may be doing epoll_ctl()s?I should mention that the 2.4 patch is old WRT mainline epoll in 2.6 (I stopped maintaining it when 2.6 went "stable"). I'd definitely suggest to use 2.6 if you are looking at epoll.
Is there someone else I should be asking this question? Thanks, Davy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: select() efficiency / epoll
- From: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
- Re: select() efficiency / epoll
- References:
- select() efficiency
- From: Davy Durham <pubaddr2@davyandbeth.com>
- Re: select() efficiency
- From: bert hubert <bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl>
- Re: select() efficiency / epoll
- From: Davy Durham <pubaddr2@davyandbeth.com>
- Re: select() efficiency / epoll
- From: bert hubert <bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl>
- Re: select() efficiency / epoll
- From: Davy Durham <pubaddr2@davyandbeth.com>
- Re: select() efficiency / epoll
- From: Willy Tarreau <willy@w.ods.org>
- Re: select() efficiency / epoll
- From: Davy Durham <pubaddr2@davyandbeth.com>
- Re: select() efficiency / epoll
- From: Willy Tarreau <willy@w.ods.org>
- Re: select() efficiency / epoll
- From: Davy Durham <pubaddr2@davyandbeth.com>
- Re: select() efficiency / epoll
- From: Willy Tarreau <willy@w.ods.org>
- Re: select() efficiency / epoll
- From: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
- select() efficiency
- Prev by Date: Re: [Samba] Re: New maintainer needed for the Linux smb filesystem
- Next by Date: Re: select() efficiency / epoll
- Previous by thread: Re: select() efficiency / epoll
- Next by thread: Re: select() efficiency / epoll
- Index(es):
