Re: select() efficiency / epoll

On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 04:49:14AM -0500, Davy Durham wrote:

> However, I'm getting segfaults because some pointers in places are 
> getting set to low integer values (which didn't used to have those values).

epoll is pretty heavily benchmarked and hence tested. I don't entirely
understand the remark above and suggest looking at the generated core dumps.

-- 
http://www.PowerDNS.com      Open source, database driven DNS Software 
http://netherlabs.nl              Open and Closed source services
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: select() efficiency / epoll
    • From: Davy Durham <[email protected]>

• References:
  • select() efficiency
    • From: Davy Durham <[email protected]>
  • Re: select() efficiency
    • From: bert hubert <[email protected]>
  • Re: select() efficiency / epoll
    • From: Davy Durham <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [Hugetlb x86] 3/3 Check p?d_present in huge_pte_offset()
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] fix send_sigqueue() vs thread exit race
• Previous by thread: Re: select() efficiency / epoll
• Next by thread: Re: select() efficiency / epoll
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]